Accreditation of US hospitals did not improve patient outcomes


The BMJ published

Association between patient outcomes and accreditation in US hospitals: observational study by Lam et al. BMJ 2018;363:k4011  http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4011

The Boston doctors investigated over 4 million patient outcomes in this retrospective observational study.

Their conclusions?

“US hospital accreditation by independent organizations is not associated with lower mortality, and is only slightly associated with reduced readmission rates for the 15 common medical conditions selected in this study. There was no evidence in this study to indicate that patients choosing a hospital accredited by The Joint Commission confer any healthcare benefits over choosing a hospital accredited by another independent accrediting organization.”

It’s not run by the ISO gang but the idea is similar.  The Joint Commission dominates the marketplace and its inspections focus on structural factors and processes rather than the outcomes that matter.

Let’s hope for more studies like this exposing multimillion dollar rip-offs.

No time to read the paper?  Medscape has a shorter summary here.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Medicine and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s