Educational “events” have only a small part in how doctors learn

The BMJ reports that Continuing Medical Education is devoid of evidence that it works.  Like accreditation.  Why, in recent years, has everything been build on items of faith for which there is no evidence?  Regimes like training records, CPD and revalidation must be rigidly enforced so that no-one has the courage to admit they’ve been taken for a ride.

The requirement that doctors keep their skills and knowledge up to date has become an item of faith in most developed countries, but evidence on how best it can be done is scarce, and there is no adequate way of measuring its effectiveness, a conference at BMA House in London on 26 June was told.

The conference, jointly organised by the BMJ and the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, was jolted out of any sense of complacency by these claims from Janet Grant, an educational psychologist who is director of the Centre for Medical Education in Context.

“There are a lot of declamatory statements and a lot of assertions made about continuing medical education,” she said, “but not a lot of evidence, no common rationale, no systematic relationship to need, and no robust evidence of beneficial effects on a …

Everybody’s sold on this notion. So it doesn’t have to be true.

This entry was posted in Bureaucracy, Cartel, Laboratory medicine, Law, Management, Medicine, NHS, Psychology and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s