In earlier versions the earth’s temperature looked something like the percentage of people rejecting the global warming ideology:
It was used to justify numerous plans to raise the cost of living and to transfer more taxpayers’ money to the truly wealthy. It gave us ridiculous “carbon footprints” to make the taxpayer believe that monetisation of carbon credits for the enrichment of banksters and congressmen was reasonable.
If quality were measurable, which (if either) graph might show the change in quality brought about by the ISO accreditation hoax?
Has accreditation made quality flatline, or is it declining? Why does nobody see the need to investigate with adequately designed randomised controlled double-blind trials? Or even some investigative journalism…if anyone can remember how.