Monthly Archives: November 2012

Inspectors are never close enough

Further criticism of organisational wrongs approved by likes of the Care Quality Commission: “The degree of supervision required for the protection of the most vulnerable in society costs money. Such supervision cannot be left to the Care Quality Commission They have … Continue reading

Posted in Bureaucracy, Management, Medicine, NHS | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Normally useless

Overall, general health checks were not found to reduce total or cause-specific morbidity or mortality risks. Most doctors will not be surprised to learn that general health checks are of no benefit for a typical patient.  Yet they participate in burdensome accreditation schemes … Continue reading

Posted in Bureaucracy, Laboratory medicine, Medicine, NHS | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thomas Andrews, Shipwright

The inspection cartel claims credit for improving and assuring quality.  There’s no evidence that it does.  The inspection regime is claiming the good work of expert technicians is the cartel’s doing.  This is another way that unproductive zombies consume the … Continue reading

Posted in Cartel, Management, Philosophy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Texting with cartoons

Peter Case sang, “I used to think love could heal all wounds, but then again I still watch cartoons.” Be warned.  Reality is different. Karen De Coster writes sagely of phone texting addicts: “But experience shows that eventually, not only … Continue reading

Posted in Bureaucracy, Practical problems, Science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The hidden Tamiflu data

We have previously considered how the ISO inspection cartel fails to step onto the Cochrane ladder of evidence.  It has no data to present on its own efficacy, effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. Roche also has been evasive about revealing clinical data … Continue reading

Posted in Cartel, Economics, Laboratory medicine, Medicine, NHS, Politics, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The opposite of Robin Hood

Unlike much of the environmentalist scam, the accreditation cartel doesn’t need to do junk science.  It substantially sidesteps scientific proof regarding itself. The purpose of science is to be a body that inspection organisations can parasitise.  Lew Rockwell interviews James Delingpole on why … Continue reading

Posted in Cartel, Economics, Politics, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment