Connect the dots


The Red Tape

David Willetts, Minister for Universities and Science, writes that

EU red tape is now getting in the way of scientific progress.

Criticising some of the old fashioned red tape, he misses the ISO accreditation scam that the BSI gave the world.  Britain is the source and many Britons still gain comfort and income from it.  Some Britons love EU regulation more than the Europeans.  The Cabinet Office and BSI are still promoting UKAS since they have believed its assertion that accreditation is an alternative to legislation.  It only changes where the money flows.

Mr Willetts omits to mention the multiple international accreditation schemes that certain clinical departments are subject to without new resources being provided.

Elsewhere, the Telegraph reports,

More than a thousand incompetent doctors will be rooted out by new regular appraisals, health secretary Jeremy Hunt said today.

Mr Hunt said that a survey 300 health bodies had identified 0.7 per cent of doctors – about 1,000 out of 175,000 practioners – about whom there were “serious concerns”…

Will this bring an end to mistreatment, complaints, claims and enquiries, or is it too of little use?  Could incompetence arise from the stress of always preparing records for scrutiny?  Who is checking that?

 

Readers’ comments below the article provide more sensible solutions.

Maybe continual checking is not helpful at all – the BMJ reports on a Cochrane review:

Annual health checks do not reduce mortality, says Cochrane review

BMJ 2012; 345 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7001 (Published 17 October 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e7001 

Jacqui Wise

General health checks do not reduce morbidity or mortality and should not be included as part of a public health programme, say Cochrane researchers who carried out a systematic review of the evidence.

The review, published in the Cochrane Library, included 14 trials involving 182 880 people.1 Nine of the trials studied the risk of death and included 155 899 participants. Health checks had no effect on the risk of death or on the specific risk of death from cardiovascular disease or cancer.

Neither did the researchers find an effect on the risk of illness, although one trial found an increased number of people that health checks identified as having hypertension and high cholesterol concentrations, and …

Will someone please connect the dots?

The … in the room.

How long will we wait for a Cochrane review of whether any types of quality inspections make a worthwhile difference?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Bureaucracy, Laboratory medicine, Management, Medicine, NHS, Politics, Questions and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s