Homeopathy is worthless and unethical

Substitute “accreditation” where this article reads “homeopathy.”

Pathology leaders: understand the connection between the romantic fictions of alternative medicine and accreditation, and why unvalidated laboratory accreditation is unethical.

Homeopathy is worthless… says an expert in the subject as he claims it is unethical to prescribe treatments on NHS


Accusations: Edzard Ernst, a professor of complementary medicine at Exeter University, has accused homeopaths of lying to their patients

Homeopathic potions do not work and it is unethical to give them on the NHS, a leading scientist has claimed.

Edzard Ernst, a former professor of  complementary medicine, also described the logic behind homeopathy as bizarre and accused homeopaths of lying to their patients.

The NHS spends around £4million a year on homeopathy, despite calls from the British Medical Association for the funding to end. 

The discipline – which has won the backing of Prince Charles – claims to prevent and treat  diseases by using dilute forms of materials that in higher concentrations could produce the symptoms of the condition.

Homeopaths also believe that the greater the dilution of the medicine, the more potent the potion, and so ingredients are mixed in tiny amounts with water or alcohol. 

A typical remedy could have one part of an ingredient to one trillion, trillion parts of water. Although scientists argue the potions are so dilute they are unlikely to contain any of the original substance, homeopaths claim the water retains a ‘memory’ of the active ingredient, which it passes to the body to help fight the illness.

But Professor Ernst said that even if an ultra-dilute homeopathic solution was somehow different from pure water, this would not make it an effective drug.

Professor Ernst, a former homeopath who researched complementary medicine at Exeter University until last year, said the treatments could be dangerous if people chose them over conventional medicines with proven benefits. 

He accused homeopaths who cite studies showing the treatments work of ‘cherry-picking’ results. 


However, the professor saved his most scathing criticism for the Government. He said if a homeopath doesn’t tell a patient that the treatment is worthless, he is not telling the truth. Modern medical ethics state that patients must be fully informed and telling lies to patients is not acceptable. 

‘It follows that the Government’s decision to continue offering homeopathy on the NHS is not ethical.’

The Commons science and technology committee recently criticised state funding of the treatments, saying it conferred scientific legitimacy. 

Dr Mark Downs, chief executive of the Society of Biology, said: ‘The UK spends literally billions of pounds every year ensuring that the new and existing conventional medicines we take are effective, safe and fit for purpose. 

‘It makes no sense to allow other treatments through public expenditure to be made available without application of the same standards.’

A spokesman for the Department of Health said: ‘We believe in patients being able to make informed choices about their treatment, and in a clinician being able to prescribe the treatment they feel most appropriate in particular circumstances, which may include complementary or alternative treatments such as homeopathy.’

He said that in 2010 around  0.001 per cent of the overall drugs bill was spent on prescriptions for homeopathic medicines.

This entry was posted in Cartel, Laboratory medicine, Management, Medicine, NHS, Philosophy and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s