The relatively small amount of money spent on pathology services undoubtedly has disproportionate leverage on further medical care. Pathologists often claim that 70% of clinical decisions are influenced by laboratory medicine data.
Where did this figure come from and what does it mean exactly? Mike Hallworth has written a paper questioning the origins and meaning of this oft-repeated claim.
But the 70% claim has no cartel, no legislation, no marketing, no peer-pressure, or weltanschauung behind it.
Just pathologists seeking wider understanding of what they do in busy, unglamorous labs and, increasingly, call-centre-inspired open plan offices.
The author says, “Until a better evidence base is available, use of the various ‘70% claims’ should be resisted in favour of more specific and evidence-based indices of added value.”
Would that similar critical thinking were applied to the claims of accreditation!
Accessing the paper may require registration but a free personal trial registration is available.