Radical traceability problem

Could the SI system be breaking down?  The kilogram (yes, THE kilogram) is no longer that.

Fatty: The official SI measure for a kilogram, a 1889 cylinder housed in the Pavillon de Breteuil in Paris, is now inexplicably 50micrograms out

The International Prototype Kilogram (IPK) has been surreptitiously changing its weight.

Is it insured?  Is it accredited?  How do they accredit the traceability of the standard from which all others are derived?

The pascal, newton, joule; they all depend on it.

It’s only 50 micrograms out at the moment, so I suppose we can ignore it for a while. But would inspectors ignore it if it were your kilogram and they accredited it?  Are they going to be looking for all our uncertainty of measurement calculations to be redone?

That would undermine the “confidence” they sell, wouldn’t it?  So I suppose they’ll just ignore it.  Give it the Nelson’s eye or something.

Oh, sorry!

I no longer have confidence in them.  Do you?

Fear not!  From 2014 they will calculate the kilogram from Planck’s Constant. Traceability will be to a mathematical construct, as the other six base units of the SI have been redefined.  A virtual kilogram.  An irreducibly correct kilogram.  An eternal value we can again have confidence in.  Until the next time.  A fundamental change, yet the superstructure will remain the same.  I don’t predict a riot.  Maybe it really doesn’t matter at all…

This entry was posted in Bureaucracy, Cartel, Politics, Questions, Science and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s